Nephilim/giants, result of angel/human union ?
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Nephilim/giants, result of angel/human union ?
We have already shown that trees are symbolic for people and therefore resulted in more people being in Eden than Adam, Eve and the serpent.
I will back this up for you using basic English grammar rules. This can also go very deep but I will try and keep it as simple as I can. We have already shown that “man” is a descriptive word meaning ruddy. Please keep this in mind when reading the following passages.
Ge 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;

Please note God is speaking about a singular person here as shown by the use of the word HIM.
Man is description and gender.
HIM is number being singular.
We then see a semicolon which means end of action, start of a new action but related to action before.
God goes on to say after a semicolon.
Gen 1;27 male and female created he them.

God says Male ( plural) and Female(plural) created He THEM ( plural).
Please note females are mentioned here and we know Eve has not been made yet.
Some will call this use of Male and female wording here paraphrasing, but you cannot paraphrase something that has not happened yet.
For instance, you cannot paraphrase Eve if she has not been created yet. This is the first occurrence of the female being mentioned.
It seems Eve was not the first woman on earth. We know this is true if you go to symbolic Beasts and Fowl thread.
So let's call the singular guy, HIM and the plural people, THE THEM.
God goes on to give two separate and different instructions. Let's look at the following passage.
GEN 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth,
So God told THEM to go ahead and take dominion and start replenishing the earth.
But to Adam/HIM God gave a different instruction :
Ge 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
So whilst the THEM went to take dominion over the earth , God took the singular man and put HIM in the garden to keep it.
We know that God had a relationship with this man as they spoke together, this man was more like a friend and companion to God.
Do you see the two different instructions for the two groups?

Eventually God sees that it is not good for this singular man to be alone and that HE couldn't find a partner amongst the THEM.( See SYMBOLIC BEASTS and FOWL THREAD)
Enter EVE in GEN 2;22.
Adam and Eve and their bloodline, later to become Israel, are also known as the Sons of GOD and the THEM people are later to be called the sons and daughters of men. These end up being the gentile ruddy nations.
It is very important we see this as many scriptures are horribly distorted due to the fact we just cannot see more than one creation in Eden. Let me give you a perfect example of this distortion in the following passage.
GEN . 6:4
There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
Now most people read that sentence as “ The angels of God came down and had children with humans and that resulted in their children being giants” ( nephilim)
That sounds more like a mythological, pagan teaching to me.
Let's look at the passage again and read it slowly.
GEN . 6:4
There were giants in the earth in those days;
Fair enough, and I'm sure there were giants in those days. No problem so far.
Next sentence.
and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men,
OK, So AFTER THAT for starters. AFTER there were giants in the earth. Meaning there were giants before the sons of God took daughters of men and had children.
God is very specific about how He words the scriptures. Had HE wanted us to think these giants were a result of this union He might have said.
“ Sons of God saw the daughters of men were fair and bare children, the same were giants and were men of old......”
But God did not say that at all.
Remember earlier I said the Single Adam line were known as the “ Sons of God” and the plural, THEM were known as the “ Sons and daughters of men”
Let us see if this is true by going back a chapter in the Bible. To GEN 5
5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:
5:6
And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos:
5:7
And Seth lived after he begat Enos eight hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters:
5:9 And Enos lived ninety years, and begat Cainan:
5:10
And Enos lived after he begat Cainan eight hundred and fifteen * * years, and begat sons and daughters:
Interesting to note how God follows the bloodline through the eldest sons.
Now logically who would Seth have begotten children with if he didn't take a woman from the THEM?
Same as with his son Enos and so on and so on.
They would have had to taken for themselves woman from the THEM, the daughters of men,
or they would have been an inbred lot.
Don't tell me that the incest law had not been written yet, so it was not applicable.
They still knew not to inbreed as we know from the story of Noah and Ham resulting in the inbred Canaan being cursed by God.
Isn't is amazing how it is all in the Bible, all we need to do is seek and apply a little logic.
No need to get complicated as God has given it unto us babes.
Do you see that if we do not read slowly and carefully how we can get so horribly lost. Satan has a field day with us and how we warp God's word to form a new doctrine within Christianity. This is Satan's favourite tactic.
God Bless in Truth and revelation.
I will back this up for you using basic English grammar rules. This can also go very deep but I will try and keep it as simple as I can. We have already shown that “man” is a descriptive word meaning ruddy. Please keep this in mind when reading the following passages.
Ge 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him;

Please note God is speaking about a singular person here as shown by the use of the word HIM.
Man is description and gender.
HIM is number being singular.
We then see a semicolon which means end of action, start of a new action but related to action before.
God goes on to say after a semicolon.
Gen 1;27 male and female created he them.

God says Male ( plural) and Female(plural) created He THEM ( plural).
Please note females are mentioned here and we know Eve has not been made yet.
Some will call this use of Male and female wording here paraphrasing, but you cannot paraphrase something that has not happened yet.
For instance, you cannot paraphrase Eve if she has not been created yet. This is the first occurrence of the female being mentioned.
It seems Eve was not the first woman on earth. We know this is true if you go to symbolic Beasts and Fowl thread.
So let's call the singular guy, HIM and the plural people, THE THEM.
God goes on to give two separate and different instructions. Let's look at the following passage.
GEN 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth,
So God told THEM to go ahead and take dominion and start replenishing the earth.
But to Adam/HIM God gave a different instruction :
Ge 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
So whilst the THEM went to take dominion over the earth , God took the singular man and put HIM in the garden to keep it.
We know that God had a relationship with this man as they spoke together, this man was more like a friend and companion to God.
Do you see the two different instructions for the two groups?

Eventually God sees that it is not good for this singular man to be alone and that HE couldn't find a partner amongst the THEM.( See SYMBOLIC BEASTS and FOWL THREAD)
Enter EVE in GEN 2;22.
Adam and Eve and their bloodline, later to become Israel, are also known as the Sons of GOD and the THEM people are later to be called the sons and daughters of men. These end up being the gentile ruddy nations.
It is very important we see this as many scriptures are horribly distorted due to the fact we just cannot see more than one creation in Eden. Let me give you a perfect example of this distortion in the following passage.
GEN . 6:4
There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
Now most people read that sentence as “ The angels of God came down and had children with humans and that resulted in their children being giants” ( nephilim)
That sounds more like a mythological, pagan teaching to me.
Let's look at the passage again and read it slowly.
GEN . 6:4
There were giants in the earth in those days;
Fair enough, and I'm sure there were giants in those days. No problem so far.
Next sentence.
and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men,
OK, So AFTER THAT for starters. AFTER there were giants in the earth. Meaning there were giants before the sons of God took daughters of men and had children.
God is very specific about how He words the scriptures. Had HE wanted us to think these giants were a result of this union He might have said.
“ Sons of God saw the daughters of men were fair and bare children, the same were giants and were men of old......”
But God did not say that at all.
Remember earlier I said the Single Adam line were known as the “ Sons of God” and the plural, THEM were known as the “ Sons and daughters of men”
Let us see if this is true by going back a chapter in the Bible. To GEN 5
5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:
5:6
And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos:
5:7
And Seth lived after he begat Enos eight hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters:
5:9 And Enos lived ninety years, and begat Cainan:
5:10
And Enos lived after he begat Cainan eight hundred and fifteen * * years, and begat sons and daughters:
Interesting to note how God follows the bloodline through the eldest sons.
Now logically who would Seth have begotten children with if he didn't take a woman from the THEM?
Same as with his son Enos and so on and so on.
They would have had to taken for themselves woman from the THEM, the daughters of men,
or they would have been an inbred lot.
Don't tell me that the incest law had not been written yet, so it was not applicable.
They still knew not to inbreed as we know from the story of Noah and Ham resulting in the inbred Canaan being cursed by God.
Isn't is amazing how it is all in the Bible, all we need to do is seek and apply a little logic.
No need to get complicated as God has given it unto us babes.
Do you see that if we do not read slowly and carefully how we can get so horribly lost. Satan has a field day with us and how we warp God's word to form a new doctrine within Christianity. This is Satan's favourite tactic.
God Bless in Truth and revelation.
Bee- Admin
- Posts: 12
Join date: 2008-08-19
Location: South Africa

Similar topics» Angel damansara
» Orinias & Nephilim - Angelic/Demonic Hybrids
» Steev Quail - Aliens and Giants. On Coast to Cosat
» The End Times: Changing the Human Frequency
» Human Resource Management Dissertations
» Orinias & Nephilim - Angelic/Demonic Hybrids
» Steev Quail - Aliens and Giants. On Coast to Cosat
» The End Times: Changing the Human Frequency
» Human Resource Management Dissertations
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum